That's the art
Jules Élisard
Place free from the boredom.
Moment removed from economic laws.
Process in becoming in their own.
A lot of and much more can be the definitions for individual and collective action that have the daring to foreshadow the life for what it could be and not only what it is.
That's the Art.
A bet.
But overall a challenge.
To overcome the established, the already done, the definite. Because nothing opposes to art as the resignation to the state of the things.
To the things of this state that take up, invade, permeate every moment of the life, so that is colonized, exploited and at the end, done through again.
The Art is to be done, while it does, Like the revolution who has no boss, no troops, no strategies, no tactics, no hidden motive, no hide means.
The art it's revolutionary because it know that it is not at the service not even of the revolution.
It's not about to serve but to be. It's take time against the time's death.
Decreed death and imposed in name of the instancy:
premature ejaculation of a strangle pleasure. To hurry up, but above all more with low price.
Art has not a price.
It is not a thing to buy,
but it is a situation to live. Creating situations
it is open space of freedom in which you can do it,
testing the grade, the capability, to amaze, to astonish, to excite...
Only if we are excited we have the necessary strength to astonish.
That it's the ART.
A tribute to the life to invent.
|
The net of the deceits
of Jacqueline Ceresoli
The future travels on internet and lives with the progress, transforming the technology in a fantastic tale, a site is the virtual space who allows to come in the dream's world: SITART is a neutral place, the utopian town where the artists of each sex, religion, language and country relationship on the possibility to see realized the desires.
Sitart is a place where the dream can be realized that allows the access to the spell worlds of the thousand and more "towns" and cyberspaces imagined by the artists. The site's objective is to go beyond the spatial and technical limits of a new instrument, that is the internet service, transmigrate from an artistic experience to another "to map" unexplored territories.
The navigator who venture inside this relations sphere, passing from a place to another of the imagination, amongst participation, projects, artistic and photographic works, sculptures and installations realized by different artist, with different training and languages, does not have questions or waiting, but he has to dip in the trick without end, without explanations, aware of the fact that the only reference is a simulate of the reality by messages and variable signs.
Sitart is an electronic mosaic, just click on one of about forty artist's name who take part to the artistic's project on the net, and there appears on the video imagines that capture our sight, allowing to cross the border on a mobile dimension on constant evolution.
Immersing in the fluctuate atmosphere of the virtual not-place we feel as Pierrot or the angels of a new "Les Enfants du Paradis" not Carne's version, but subjective. The mechanism is simple, it's sufficient open the site to know the neutral zone of the places, the wherever of the experiences.
Everybody can find new stimulus or zapping as their own desires and curiosity, passing through an icon to another.
The navigator "flaneus" when come into the net, became an actor, realizing the Alice's dream to jump in the mirror and crossing it. Once get through it, cancelling the physical distances, the onlooker will be comfortable in this Art's Disneyland where, though the virtual images it is more natural living the artificial. The secret to accede to this "panopticon" of imaginary, is the extensions of the horizons beyond the concrete space. In any case if you forget the exception space or town on a "human scale", this site is on a "desire scale".
A fluid dimension of colours, shapes, projects, sociality, adventures who becoming "impulse transfer" for who is looking and faming a liquid, multipurpose space addressed to a plurality of users.
Sitart is democratic, everybody can see it, but only the "iconouros" and the "artistmaniac" sink the sight beyond the formal surface and the aesthetic's imagine, visualizing their dreams beyond the icons manipulated from others.
According to Proust , in the "Recherche", the name come before the direct experience of the same place, then Florence and Venice are name that evoke not places but atmospheres.
Sitart exists as place of relations of imaginary, is full of expectations always open to "probable" sights or inventive whims that extent the glance beyond the physical border.
The doubt is if we will manage to recognize the different works, because at a certain point we wish to see not the imagines but our projections on the enchantment.
Sitart is also knowledge, a heterogeneous space where there is coordination between sensorial experience and aesthetic that represents abstract procedures of the reasoning, it is a platform of hypothesis, definitions, movements and skidding of the thought, point out the ubiquity sense, the flexibility e the quick rotation of the elusive ideas of the composition.
The unreal imagine or lack of technical fault, get to coating a perfect model of dream and not the presented object. Sitart condense codes and technique as metaphors of the human perception to allow the recovery of models or myths in a symbolic space through artificially technology, that even thought the apparent fragmentation, get to a paradoxical coherence between the space, the time and the language.
The technology allows the immediate reception of unlimited space that get impossible the constructive activity of the memory, because it act on surface: hic et nuc
The contemporary artists are victims and executioners of an information based not more on the oral but on the visual activity, moving the interest on the effect rather that the meaning. In the electronic age, the technological experimentation confirm and develop the artificial rational inherent in the human creativity.
In the net, for example, the vague contents can take the onlooker to intense answers, or the colourless imagines can simulate virtuous exasperations, knock down the concepts of fine, ugly, reality, sham extending the concept of aesthetic beyond the imaginable.
The technique improve the phenomenon of repetition, the unexpected it's the subjective perception of the data, that perceived as a mistake could perform or change shapes of communication apparently realising, but such contradictory imagination does not represent perhaps the"bit" of our exhibitionist, spectacular culture that confuses the associative memory with the conceptual one?
Obvious question and in the same time evasive, that is looking for open questions to unexpected meaning into the net: plot of tricks reproducing in a limited series.
In short to fall through the abyss of Sitart, you dock to the logic of incomplete, built on the contradiction's principle, where the comparison of the complexity expressive of each artist, perhaps you will find combined plans held together by an uninterrupted flow, a creative, synergic tension
Essential for the autonomy of any art's work, in the net as in the real space.
|